04-02-2010, 02:51 PM
Hier, van de echte kenners rondom fixen die die odds dus volgen. Korolev-Dodig was dus geen mooi voorbeeld van fixen, daar je zit je toch echt mis. En het gaat dus voornamelijk om wat er tijdens de wedstrijd gebeurt. Die patronen van tevoren zijn wel een indicatie, maar duiden er minder op dan wat er allemaal tijdens een wedstrijd gebeurt in het live-wedden. Zoals dat voorbeeld van Canas hier.
What raised attention:
1) Move to Dodig beforehand. Nothing massive though - for a proper fix, see one of the Canas specials (ie he's a set up, and the opponent is 1.2). I think Dodig's SP was 2.7ish at pinnacle.
2) Huge trading volumes for a 1st round at a 250 between two lower lev players. This happens a lot when Russians are involved, sometimes to dodgy ends, but usually not.
I saw nothing inplay that looked like a fix though. Korolev was being a moron, but that's routine for him. He actually went for an ace in the tiebreak too, thought he had it but was called let - not the behaviour of someone trying to lose.
What raised attention:
1) Move to Dodig beforehand. Nothing massive though - for a proper fix, see one of the Canas specials (ie he's a set up, and the opponent is 1.2). I think Dodig's SP was 2.7ish at pinnacle.
2) Huge trading volumes for a 1st round at a 250 between two lower lev players. This happens a lot when Russians are involved, sometimes to dodgy ends, but usually not.
I saw nothing inplay that looked like a fix though. Korolev was being a moron, but that's routine for him. He actually went for an ace in the tiebreak too, thought he had it but was called let - not the behaviour of someone trying to lose.
Feyenoord? Het enige dat ik van Feyenoord weet, is dat ze uit het land van Ajax komen - Fabio Capello